Monday, February 21, 2011

A Trip to Israel

In February 2009 myself and my two sons went on the trip of a lifetime to Israel. Over the previous 10 years or so I had become fascinated with the study of the bible from a historical point of view and to my surprise I was treated to a week in Jerusalem for my 60th birthday. In one sense the timing was good as the war in Gaza was raging and hence the influx of visitors to the Holy Land had considerably diminished allowing us easy access to all the usual sites without them being crammed with visitors like ourselves.

We landed in Ben Gurion International Airport in Tel Aviv at about four o’clock in the morning. As it was the Sabbath day, all normal modes of transport were not operating and so we had to take a special taxi from there to Jerusalem. These taxis take about 8 people and they just wait till full before starting their journey. We sat for about half an hour before the final passenger boarded and then we took off out of a very normal looking, modern day airport, back into history. I have to say I felt great excitement and anticipation in this land about which I had read so much. It was here that King David (the most famous of Jewish kings) had killed the giant Goliath (that most famous of Philistine warriors) with a single shot from his sling. Here the Ark of the Covenant had resided until finally lost sometime during the 6th century BC. Here the Jewish people were conquered many times over throughout their history, but especially by the Babylonians. Here in this land their great temple was destroyed not once, but twice. First by the Babylonians in the 6th century BC and then by the Romans in 70AD. It has never been rebuilt. Here we have the complete destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, and the fall of Jericho (when those walls came tumbling down). The stories of Samson and Delilah, the wisdom of Solomon and the visit of the Queen of Sheba. Some of the stories may not be true and even some of the characters may not have existed, but many of them did. David certainly did and was king of his people whether or not he killed Goliath. The Ark existed and was carried around by the Israelites for many years before finally ending up in the great temple in Jerusalem. The Babylonians inflicted a great defeat on the Jews and brought them into exile for many years. Jericho is a real city, existing today as in the past, although the story of it’s walls crashing to the ground at the sounding of trumpets on Joshua’s order is surely apocryphal. Not to mention the fact that Jesus Christ, the most famous character in western civilization, also walked on this soil.

But no matter, separating history from legend is fascinating and the strange thing is that quite a lot of what is spoken about in the Bible and which many scholars shrugged off as not historical has turned out to be fact. For example many assumed Sodom never existed but now excavations have shown evidence of this ancient city, that at least it existed. In fact, a similar tale can be related about the city of Troy from whence came the famous Helen. Initially it was thought to be a fictional city in the story by Homer, but subsequently was actually found.

Anyway, here I was, in a taxi travelling through the land of Israel towards Jerusalem. Brought to mind the lines from Yeats’ poem “The Second Coming”:

And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?


Then I saw the signs in Hebrew, Arabic and English pointing towards Jerusalem. At this point I knew I was really in this fantastic land. That may seem strange to say, but no matter what way you look at it, my whole Irish Catholic culture, whether as a believer or atheist, comes directly from this place. Maybe it took a slight detour via Rome, but it’s origins are right here.

Then suddenly we were stopping outside our hostel, the YMCA, right opposite the most well known hotel in Israel, the King David, a part of which was blown up by a militant Zionist group in 1946. But we were too tired to care, having being travelling from early morning the day before. We got to our room and crashed out.

However, later that morning we rose, eager to hit the old town of Jerusalem. We couldn’t see it from our window as the King David Hotel was in the way. After consulting our map and finding the route to the old city, we headed out of the hostel and crossed the road. Deftly dodging the taxi drivers touting for business, we made our way round the side of the King David and down a seriously hilly road. At the bottom we were rewarded with a first view of Jerusalem. For this we had come so far. It was magnificent even though we could only see one of the main walls and the Jaffa Gate across the valley. It reminded me forcibly of the woodcut I reproduce above of the pilgrims’ first sight of Jerusalem under the escort of the Knights Templar.

We entered by the Jaffa Gate, which had been built by Suleiman the Magnificent in the 16th century. At this time Jerusalem was ruled by the Ottoman Empire and it was due to Sultan Suleiman that the present walls of Jerusalem were built. So passing through this gate we passed by the original brickwork and mortar built by the Moslems nearly 500 years ago. The first thing we did was to breakfast at a little café inside the old city. So now we had to decide what to do next. There was such a choice, but we thought the best idea was to walk the walls themselves and so get an overview of the city. There are a number of different walks you can do, but we took the route from the Jaffa Gate round by the Damascus Gate to the Lion’s Gate. In hindsight this was the better of the two routes we could have chosen as it indeed gave us a great overview of the old city, including the Church of the holy Sepulchre which contains Calvary and the tomb of Jesus. Also the beautiful golden Dome of the Rock, one of the most iconic sights of Jerusalem, the Islamic shrine built on the Temple Mount.

It was a hot sunny day and remarkably few people were on the wall. We were able to take our ease and take in the sights. At the Damascus Gate we paused, listening to and watching the hubbub of people shopping in the market below. Much to our surprise we also noticed some Irish graffiti on a building “Tiocfaidh ar lá o saoirse”. I don’t know what it means but guess at something like “Our freedom will come one day”. Continuing along the walls we could see the Garden of Gethsemane in the distance across the Kidron Valley and the Mount of Olives, one of the places from which Christ is supposed to have ascended into heaven.

And suddenly right in our path comes a snake. He must have been about two feet long, a big guy. We managed to get one photo of him before he vanished over the edge of the wall.

We came down from the wall at the Lion’s Gate which is close to the point where the Via Dolorosa begins, the traditional path of Christ from where Pilot condemned him to death and ending at Calvary and his tomb. Of course, as modern scholars now point out, this is in the wrong place, but as with most things from the gospels there is more than one place commemorating where these events are supposed to have occurred.

No matter, after passing by the Church of the Condemnation and the Church of the Flagellation (what fantastic names) we came upon an intriguing little sign which simply pointed to the house of Mary, the mother of Jesus. This was at the side of the Church of St Anne which is a beautiful 12th century Crusader church erected over the traditional site of the birthplace of Anne who is the mother of Mary. Descending a flight of narrow steps I arrived in a small grotto type place which is supposed to be the house. A small little place, I guess it could have been anybody’s, but tradition has it as being the house of Anne and Joachim, the parents of Mary.

The church itself is supposed to have been designed for Gregorian chant and the acoustics are so perfect that many pilgrim groups come to sing in the church. We were privileged to be there during just such a performance by a group of black Americans. Their rich voices soared in that place and boy, was it a treat.

The church itself is next to the Bethesda Pool, believed to be the site where Jesus healed a paralytic. Here can be seen the ruins of a Roman temple to the god of medicine and also the remains of a Byzantine church built over the temple as well as the pool itself.

Afterwards we continued along the Via Dolorosa and spotted a group of pilgrims praying the Stations of the Cross. We decided to join them as they would surely lead us directly to the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. Which is exactly what happened. The present church houses both the Hill of Calvary and the tomb of Christ.

This is a fascinating building with a long history. Sometime after the crucifixion the site became a place of Christian veneration. However, after the Jewish revolt in 70AD the city of Jerusalem was totally destroyed by the Romans. Hadrian then rebuilt the city calling it Aelia Capitolina around 135AD but forbade Jews or Christians to enter it. He even constructed a pagan temple on the site of the present church.

However, all this changed after the emperor Constantine became a Christian. Legend has it that he was exposed to Christianity by his mother, Helena, but it was only before an important battle that Constantine, looking at the sun, saw a cross of light with the words “By this win”. He therefore commanded his troops to wear a Christian symbol on their shields and hence won the battle of Milvian Bridge, which gave him the emperorship of the West. Sometime afterwards he instructed Helena to go to Jerusalem, destroy the pagan temple, begin excavations and build a church on the site. She is alleged to have found not only the Hill of Calvary but also a tomb close by which was declared to be the tomb of Jesus. The church was built on the site but was damaged by fire in 916 and again in 966 during a riot. Finally it was completely destroyed in 1009. However it was rebuilt in 1048. Later the church was renovated and added to in the 12th century by the crusaders and again renovated by the Franciscans in the 16th century. It was severely damaged again by fire at the beginning of the 19th century and to this day is continually being excavated and renovated.

At present the principal custodians of the church are the Eastern Orthodox, the Armenian Christians and the Catholic Church. Others have a share in smaller areas. Unfortunately these groups continue to squabble and fight each other. In 2008 a fist fight broke out when a monk was ejected by some rivals.

However, the day we visited all was peaceful and calm. There is a strange palpable power in the place (perhaps wish fulfilment, I don’t know) and sitting quietly in one corner I noticed several people being overcome with tears. All reason and logic goes out the window and one sits and contemplates. Could it all be true? Was the Son of God really crucified only yards from where I sat? Whatever the theology, a human man was certainly crucified and buried here and whether he wanted to or not, it is because of him that the vast edifice of Western Christianity has shaped our history for more than two millennia. So there is an atmosphere of potent energy within the church, felt by believer and non-believer alike.

After a while I got up and went down some steps which led to the tomb. I queued for a short time as it only holds about three or four people and the priests like to keep things moving. But I was able to remain inside for a few minutes once again immersed in the great questions. After that we headed back to our hotel for a nice evening meal and some scoops.

The next day we decided to take a taxi up to the Mount of Olives and walk back down across the Kidron Valley to Jerusalem where we had a tour booked along Herod’s wall. Even though the driver tried to get us to change our minds and take a trip to Bethlehem instead, he turned out to be a very friendly character, a Palestinian and gave us advise on how to mind our money. I was actually touched when he shook my hand and gave us a blessing as we left his cab. Compared to him the surly curator of the Chapel of the Ascension which we visited first was most unfriendly as we paid our small entrance fee.

As with the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, there is quite a history behind this small round structure, but the present building is from Crusader times. Not an impressive place, the most interesting part is a small stone frame surrounding a rock with the supposed impression of the last footprint of Christ before he ascended to heaven. I have to say, it looked nothing like the shape of a foot to me.

After that we started to walk down the Mount of Olives to the Garden of Gethsemane. On this sunny warm day, the garden looked very serene, belying it’s terrible trauma of the night before Christ died. Today it is fenced off so you can’t walk through it, although you can stretch your hand in to touch the rough bark of the olive trees. Some say that it still contains olive trees which are approximately 2000 years old. But that is unlikely although they probably are descendants of the original trees. We continued our journey visiting the Church of All Nations which is very modern having been built at the beginning of the 20th century using funds donated by many countries around the world, hence it’s name. Being right beside the Garden of Gethsemane, it claims to contain the place where Jesus is supposed to have prayed on the night of his arrest.

From the Mount of Olives, it is possible to take in the whole panorama of the old city of Jerusalem surrounded by it’s walls and dominated by the golden cupola of the Dome of the Rock. The old city is surprisingly small, it’s surrounding walls stretch only for about 2.5 miles. But looking at it stretched out in all it’s glory, the most amazing thing about it is the mass of history it encapsulates and the fact that it is a most sacred city to three of the world’s largest religions: Jews, Muslims and Christians.

We walked down into the Kidron Valley which separates the Mount of Olives from the old city itself. Walking through this valley we came upon some very ancient monuments, more than two thousand years old and it struck me forcibly that Christ must have seen these too as he was dragged to Jerusalem from the Garden of Gethsemane as this is the only route he could have taken.

Entering into the old city, we headed for the Western (or Wailing) Wall. It is the remains of the wall which surrounded the Jewish Temple and is one of the most sacred places for Jews today, as it is the closest they can now get to the Holy of Holies where God himself was supposed to have dwelt before the total destruction of the temple by the Romans around 70AD as mentioned above. One part of the wall is sectioned off for women, while we entered the men’s section (orthodox Jewry being very male dominated, even today). We were given a little skullcap made from cardboard to wear as a mark of respect and were allowed to go anywhere we wished. It is daunting to think that this wall was erected by King Herod the Great about 19BC. Some of the stones weigh up to 8 tons each with one in particular weighing in excess of 500 tons. How the builders moved and positioned them is just incredible. Of course I had to touch the wall itself and again the shear weight of history comes through. And crammed into every crevice were scraps of paper which hold prayers and petitions from devout Jews.

A large part of the wall continues underground and as we had booked a tour of this area in advance, we headed for the entrance to this fascinating historical guide. Suffice it to say that the walk took us through thousands of years of history in the footsteps of Herod, Solomon, David and others. At the end of the tour we exited into the Muslim quarter of the old city. This exit was only opened in the late 1980’s and caused a riot at the time. I remember walking along the street and had been one of the last to leave the tunnel. I noticed a young guy walking quite closely behind me and didn’t particularly feel at ease with it. I stopped and motioned for him to go ahead which he did, although giving me a funny look. Next thing I notice he was in conversation with my sons up ahead, so I caught up wondering what was going on. It turns out he was a member of Israeli security, part of whose job is to make sure that the visitors are safe on leaving the tour. I have to say I didn’t feel particularly unsafe, but I guess nothing is taken for granted in Israel.

Either that same day or the next day, I can’t remember which, we paid a visit to the Dome of the Rock. This is an Islamic shrine located on the Temple Mount one side of which is the Western Wall. This is a magnificent building, octagonal in shape with a massive golden dome on the roof. The gold was added by King Hussein of Jordan in 1993. Unfortunately, due to the Gaza war, we were not allowed inside the building. The Muslim curator explained, almost apologetically, that only Muslims could enter the building at this time. This was a great pity.

Another day we headed out of the old city and went to Mount Zion. Here, besides lots of churches commemorating one thing or another, we found a crusader built castle which houses the room of the last supper. Of course this cannot be the actual site as this was only built in the 12th century, but many scholars say it is probably the correct area. But it’s something for the visitors to see. Coming from this we came to another building which supposedly housed the tomb of David. We were stopped on the way in by a little man indicating that we needed to wear a skullcap, which were available from him for a small fee. We proceeded to enter the room with the tomb of David which a lot of scholars say is not where David rests at all. Anyway, once inside the door we were amused to find a box full of skullcaps which could be borrowed for free. So the little guy had taken us for a ride. Well, we didn’t lose much and it looked like he needed the money. Then he started telling us about the place, and we said we didn’t need a guide but found it difficult to get rid of him. At last when we were leaving he put his hand out for money and I told him we hadn’t asked for his services and he could take a hike. He turned quite nasty and called us filthy people. I just laughed and shrugged my shoulders but he sure as hell wasn’t getting another penny out of us.

Overall in the holy land we weren’t bothered by guys trying to get hired. Mostly we just ignored them and they quickly got the message. A few would persist trying out different languages on us, but we usually started speaking the little Irish we knew and they soon went away. Once I saw a taxi driver really hassling these two old folk and as I passed I noticed that they looked quite frightened. I stopped and said to the man, under my breath, “Just ignore him and walk away”. He took my advice and they walked with me a short way leaving the taxi driver shouting something after us. They turned out to be an American couple and they thanked me for my help. I said it was nothing and advised them to just keep walking if anybody bothered them. I have to add that I found the vast majority of the people we dealt with very friendly and even though there were soldiers walking around with guns hanging out of them all over the place, I never felt safer in a foreign city.

While visiting Mount Zion we also took the time to visit Oscar Schindler’s grave. It is a custom in Jewish graveyards that visitors place a stone on the tomb of people they visit. Schindler’s grave is packed with stones which is a mark of the respect the Jewish people felt for this German “Nazi” who helped so many of their people during the war.

As with many other places in the Holy Land, there is a second site which purports to be the room of the last supper. This time it is inside the old city of Jerusalem. It is not a place you can just walk into and we had to find ourselves a guide. I think our guide turned out to be an Armenian nun and she opened up the place for us. It was a beautiful old church in the Armenian quarter. The nun began to regale us with miracle stories and eventually we had to ask her if we could see the last supper room. She brought us downstairs and turned on the lights, explaining that the street level was lower in those days and while this room was below ground now, in Jesus’ time it was on the second floor. It was a small room, sparsely furnished with some pictures and a small altar. Going back upstairs I asked her if she could speak Aramaic, the language that Christ spoke. She said yes and offered to sing the Our Father in Aramaic, which she did. Although interesting, I would have preferred if she had simply recited it as I wanted to hear what the language itself sounded like, although I suppose I could just watch Mel Gibson’s film, Passion of the Christ, to hear it.

During our week in Jerusalem we hired a car for one day. While tourists are not allowed to drive hired cars in the Palestinian areas, we are allowed to drive on one designated Israeli controlled road through the West Bank. On our way, we were flagged down by an Israeli soldier weighed down with a heavy automatic machine gun. He couldn’t have been more than twenty years of age and asked us where we were going. We told him, Masada. “Okay,” he says, “Can I have a lift? I’m going as far as Qumran which is just down the road.” Well, what do you say to a guy asking for a lift who’s toting a machine gun? I guess you say yes. So he got into the back of the car, hauling his automatic with him. He turned out to be a very nice guy and we chatted in general about Israel and tourism. We thought it mightn’t be a good idea to ask him for a go of his gun!

Having left our guest at Qumran (where the Dead Sea scrolls were discovered) we continued on to Masada. This is a fortress built by Herod the Great and sits on top of a massive rock plateau which rises out of the surrounding landscape to a height of about 1300 feet on the side closest to the Dead Sea and about 300 feet on the other side. It is an ideal place for defence as access is difficult and dangerous. A few years before the fall of Jerusalem in 70AD the small Roman garrison at Masada was overcome by a group of Jewish rebels and their numbers were much enlarged after the destruction of the city by more rebels fleeing from the battle. For about two years these rebels raided and harassed the Romans until Flavius Silva, a Roman general marched against Masada. Well defended and almost impossible to attack directly, Masada held out against the Roman siege. Eventually the Romans built a ramp up the side of Masada and hauled a battering ram up to the walls where they eventually gained entry. However, when the Romans entered Masada, they found all the men, women and children dead. The Jews had decided to commit mass suicide rather than be taken by their sworn enemy.

My two sons braved the hour long walk up the side of Masada along the so called Snake Path. I, on the other hand, took the cable car. The view from the top is stunning, the Dead Sea below (it’s the lowest point on Earth at 1200 feet below sea level) and the land of Jordan in the distance. The remains of Roman siege camps are also easily seen in the landscape below. The basic structure of the fortress can still be seen today, the walls, the remains of the houses and storerooms, the massive water cisterns, and Herod’s palace. Of course the ramp built by the Romans is still there, but it doesn’t look as impressive as it must have done originally as a lot of it looks to have collapsed.

After a few hours walking around the Masada fortress we got in the car and drove to one of the areas where you can take a dip in the Dead Sea. As this is one of the saltiest bodies of water in the world it is impossible to actually swim in it. You simply wade out and sit down. You cannot sink. It is a most amazing experience, as your arms, upper back and legs are pushed above the surface and you can sit quite happily in the gently undulating current. Very relaxing indeed. Of course you are strongly advised to take a good cold shower on emerging as the salt can sting badly.

After this somewhat exhilarating experience we drove to Ein Gedi, an oasis in the Israeli desert, which is also a sanctuary for many types of plant, bird and animal species. It is a wooded hilly area with at least one river flowing through it where we sat and watched the hyrax (rock badger) jumping from rock to rock, sometimes in groups of five or six. Here we also saw the hoopoe, Israel’s national bird, a most colourful character with a beautiful crown of feathers on it’s head. Here it was, in old testament times, that King David hid from King Saul.

On another day, we walked around the more modern city of Jerusalem. Here we visited the Garden Tomb. Because some doubts were raised during the 19th century about the authenticity of the traditional sites of Golgotha and the tomb of Christ, some scholars searched for other possible places. A number of them suggested what is now referred to as the Garden Tomb as a more likely spot. This is situated outside the old city walls near the Damascus Gate. Here was found a rocky escarpment which resembles the face of a skull. A rock hewn tomb was found close by. While this is a beautiful and serene place, the majority of scholars today do not think it is the site of Christ’s crucifixion or tomb.

Moving on we walked through an ultra-Orthodox Jewish area. Visitors to this part of Jerusalem, while welcome at certain times, are asked to respect the values of the people living here and to dress and act appropriately. It was an interesting place to visit as we saw no other tourists there that day and everybody else was dressed in the traditional black coats and hat, with their long bushy sideburns and beards. We didn’t notice any women either.

Finally on one of the days, we split up and went our separate ways. Andrew went to visit the botanic gardens and then the Knesset, the Jewish parliament. Unfortunately for him the Knesset was closed that day so he went to the Israel Museum instead. Daniel went to the zoo and got some great photos. I went to the Jewish Holocaust Museum, Yad Vashem. This is Israel’s official memorial to the Jewish victims of the holocaust and comprises a history museum, a museum of holocaust art, memorial sites, a synagogue, as well as an education centre, a research centre, library, archives and a publishing house. The history museum was very impressive (if you can give such a description to pictures and videos of death). It contained thousands of pictures, film clips, testimonies of survivors including condemnations of those countries (including the Vatican) who stood by and did nothing while the concentration camps at Auschwitz and elsewhere carried on their evil work. One of the exhibits outside in the grounds which affected me most was the Cattle Car Memorial. This is an original working German railway cattle car which actually carried Jewish victims to their deaths in one of the concentration camps. Over a hundred people were crammed into this car so tightly they couldn’t sit down. The journey could last days and they had no food or water. If they needed to relieve themselves they had to do it on the spot. It was hell on earth. I stood for a long time just staring at this railway truck and tried to imagine the horror but could not. What I could conjure up in my mind was indeed horrible, but I’m sure nothing like the pain and terror these people must have suffered. I came away unable to grasp fully how inhumane man can be to his fellow beings. A very sad place, but a powerful reminder of a period of history we should never forget.

Finally, bidding the holy city farewell, we took a train to Tel Aviv, a modern bustling city founded in 1909. Even here you cannot escape the grasp of history as, while strolling on the beach, I came across and read the monument in memory of the Altalena, a ship shelled by the Israeli provisional government in 1948.

And even today Israel is still a troubled land. For more than two thousand years the Jewish people have been persecuted and mostly by so called Christian peoples. For how much longer must that terrible curse in Matthew “His blood be upon us and our children” reverberate and give excuse to anti-Semitism? I pray it won’t be long.

Thursday, February 3, 2011

Pierre Teilhard de Chardin


Pierre Teilhard de Chardin was a French Jesuit priest and scientist who worked mainly in the field of palaeontology (the study of prehistoric life, it’s evolution and environment). He was born in France in 1881 and ordained in 1911. While his initial scientific study was rooted in physics, chemistry and mathematics he went to work in the palaeontology laboratory of the National History Museum in Paris and hence more or less devoted his life to this field in conjunction with a mystical and religious worldview.

While his interpretation of evolution from a deeply religious viewpoint became his life’s main work, he is also remembered for his involvement in both the Piltdown Man and Peking Man discoveries.

Piltdown Man is probably the most well known of these two, because it was later exposed as a hoax. One of the great mysteries of the theory of evolution was the so called missing link, that skeleton which would show the change from our previous known ancestor to the human species, Homo sapiens, today. Anthropologists are still not sure of our exact lineage and our immediate ancestor is not the chimpanzee. He is our nearest relative. Both chimps and humans evolved from the same ancestor but not from each other. In the early days of evolution it was assumed that man evolved from the ape or similar creature and hence a missing link was necessary to bridge the gap. When Piltdown Man was discovered around 1912 in a gravel pit at Piltdown, a small village in southern England, many thought that this might be the missing link. And in fact scientists were fooled for quite a while that this was a genuine find. Although it bred a lot of controversy it wasn’t till the 1950’s before it was finally exposed as a forgery. While the identity of the forger was never discovered some of the main people accused included Teilhard de Chardin himself as well as Arthur Conan Doyle, the man responsible for the wonderful fictional detective, Sherlock Holmes. However the case against Teilhard de Chardin, as is true with all the suspects is very circumstantial and cannot be upheld.

Peking Man, on the other hand, discovered in the 1920’s in China was thought to be an ancestor to humans and was a genuine discovery. However today, he not considered to be a direct ancestor.

I was very much drawn to Teilhard de Chardin’s books because he was the first person who argued strongly that science and religion were compatible. For many years these two disciplines were considered to be at odds with each other. The famous example of which moves in the sky, the sun or the earth sent a number of men to the stake, most notably Giordano Bruno in 1600, although I would think the Church condemned him more for his other views (he was, after all, a practising magician, whose rites often bordered on black magic). Galileo, perhaps, is a better example. He followed the teaching of Copernicus who developed the heliocentric cosmology which basically said that the Sun was at the centre of the universe and the Earth revolved around it. He even went to Rome to try and convince the pope not to ban these ideas. Eventually he was summoned to stand trial on the suspicion of heresy. After all the bible says that the earth does not move, therefore Galileo had to be wrong. The result was that he was put under house arrest where he remained for the rest of his life.

It was only in 1992 that Pope John Paul II apologised for the treatment of Galileo at the hands of the Catholic Church. Far too late, as usual.

And of course the greatest wedge which appeared to be driven between science and religion came with the theory of evolution introduced by Charles Darwin in the 1850’s although he was not the first to suggest such a point of view. This controversy still rages today. Although the Catholic Church at long last accepted the theory, others still do not, including the so called Creationists in the United States. However, that said, evolution, although bolstered up by a lot of evidence, still remains a theory with some holes to plug. For example many point to the lack of transitional evidence, i.e. there are no missing links. Further, life is so complex that there has not been enough time to evolve from random groupings of molecules to the breathtaking wonder of DNA. However, as regards missing links, we just haven’t found any yet, although we have come close (i.e. archaeopteryx, which fossil clearly shows a type of dinosaur/bird). Besides, not every species may have left a fossil record. And the argument that life is too complex can be answered by pointing out that not every possible combination of molecules needed to be formed before something worthwhile was achieved. All DNA is subject to mutation. These changes can be beneficial, harmful or neutral. If harmful then it is unlikely that any offspring will reproduce and the mutation dies. If beneficial it is likely that the offspring will be improved and so reproduce more. It is through reproduction that beneficial mutations spread. This is natural selection at work. Over billions of years all this evolution has led to us, and as the Earth is 4.5 thousand million years old. I think that is enough time.

At the end of the day, religion and science are both searching for the same thing, i.e. the truth. At least that is my belief and in the final analysis, while not everything in religion or science today is necessarily true (a massive work in progress) they have to converge to the correct answer eventually. This does not mean there is a God. I don’t know the answer to that, no more than science or religion does. So it was nice to discover the writings of somebody who did believe that science and religion are compatible and I was glad to read his works. Since those halcyon days I have discovered many others scientists, religious and non religious people who are also convinced of that viewpoint, though not all would concur with Teilhard de Chardin’s view.

Of course Teilhard de Chardin also ran into problems with the Catholic Church, of which he was a member. Luckily, while they had done away with the Inquisition, they still forbade him from publishing his works and from teaching. As Teilhard de Chardin was a faithful member of the Jesuits and the Church, he acquiesced to the wishes of his masters, even though it caused him a lot of pain and anguish. He did consider briefly leaving, to work freely as a scientist, but decided against this course of action.

Why was he so obedient to a stupid decision by men who simply had no grasp nor understanding of his scientific and religious mysticism? I cannot answer that. I can only suggest, not only did he need to belong as a full member to his Church, but even though he regarded it’s ideas as somewhat outmoded, he was still convinced it was the true Church of his Lord, Jesus Christ. He never lost his faith in his own ideas and philosophy, but felt it better to remain within the fold, flawed and all as it might be. Today he may well have left, but this was during the first half of the twentieth century and so he stayed.

His works were only published after he had died, which gave the world a most interesting philosophy to read and digest.

I first came across Teilhard de Chardin from reading the novel “The Exorcist” by William Peter Blatty. For some reason I found this to be a fascinating book, so much better than most of the horror and ghost stories I had read before. Here was a book which took on board the whole idea of demonic possession yet went at it in as scientific a way as possible. For much of the first half there was a lot of doubt that such things could happen in the 20th century in which the story was set. Demonic possession belonged in the 16th century as Father Damian Karras, the priest in the story who is initially approached to perform an exorcism, said. Karras does not believe in the devil and is convinced there is a medical or psychological reason for the victim’s symptoms. The novel is very interesting in it’s discussion of the whole area of the real scientific reasons for seeming possession and although it leaves one in no doubt during it’s second half that demonic possession is real and the girl, Regan, is actually possessed by a demon, it is only a good fictional story. Certainly I do not believe in demons and doubt very much that they exist.

In fact, the film of the same name which was released in 1973 remained faithful to the book and portrayed evil very convincingly. I remember going to the first showing in the Adelphi cinema in Abbey Street. The theatre was packed and people were full of anticipation as this film was supposed to be really scary. And it was. It scared the hell out of us. I clearly remember at the conclusion of the first really frightening scene where the bed was shaking like mad under the girl, strangers turned and spoke to each other out of sheer relief. I certainly recall the guy beside me saying a few words and me replying although I can’t remember what we said. Never before in mainstream Irish films had we been subjected to such sheer evil on the screen. Gone were the Vincent Price type films where the orchestra started strumming up a storm, the violins rising to a crescendo as the hapless character moved closer to where the monster or whatever would leap out at him. But we were ready for that although many still jumped with fright. And then the second even more terrifying scene where the slip of a girl suddenly jumped up, smacked the doctor who was trying to inject her, her throat swollen, her face contorted and growled in a deep and guttural voice, “Leave the sow alone, she is mine”. Or words to that effect. That was a heavy scene, although looking at it today, it is more funny than anything else.

However, the main exorcist in the story is called Lankester Merrin. At one point he quipped that he had been named after a bridge. I discovered somewhere that his character was loosely based on the Jesuit priest, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. This piqued my interest for some reason and I tried to find out something about him. In those days not as easy as today where you can trawl the internet. However, I found that his most famous book was called “The Phenomenon of Man” and I purchased same quite easily in one of Dublin’s bookshops. As part of the blurb on the back, it mentioned something to do with a philosophy which would reconcile religion and the scientific theory of evolution.

Boy, was it a difficult read. I read it with a dictionary beside me and even then there were some words in the book which my dictionary didn’t contain. In hindsight I should have had a dictionary of palaeontology beside me. However, I managed to finish it and became deeply interested in the ideas in so far as I could understand them.

Basically, he regarded evolution as the correct theory for the emergence of mankind. He relegated the story of Adam and Eve to tales made up by men trying to come to terms with the world they found themselves in. Trying to make some semblance of sense of it. However, Teilhard de Chardin saw evolution as gradually moving from the basic cell to animals to humans. The arrival of humankind was a major stage in this development as we could bring our own consciousness to bear upon ourselves. Now a collective consciousness begins to develop as we learn from each other and move throughout the whole earth. He termed this collective consciousness the noosphere. The development of science and technology is one of the enablers of this movement. In those days (early 70’s) I thought that was a heady idea. Today I would say the noosphere smacks suspiciously of the world wide web, so I guess you could say Teilhard de Chardin was ahead of his time. However he went further and thought that evolution would culminate in what he termed the Omega Point. This was a sort of supreme consciousness and his ideas become very mystical from here. Frankly, he looses me here, but he sort of equates the Omega Point with the collective consciousness of mankind and brings it into a Christ-like being synonymous with God himself. And at this point I also think he must be nuts.

However, in his great synthesis he stated that the traditional interpretations of creation in the bible had to be abandoned. This immediately raised grave alarm with Vatican officials for it implied that Adam and Eve never existed. Without our first parents, there could be no original sin. Therefore did this imply there was no need for mankind to be redeemed, no need for Christ to die on the cross? God knows where all this would have ended up and hence the consternation among the cardinals of the Church can be imagined. Although in their usual heavy handed manner, they decided to ban him rather than open dialogue with him.

Of course, many people said his philosophy was mad and maybe it was, but what struck me most forcibly in those days was his insistence on the compatibility of science and religion. This was what I was looking for in my twenties, as I had just decided to become a fully fledged atheist and was struggling with belief. Teilhard de Chardin’s books helped me to make some sense of all of this and I always look on him as a great teacher, at least for me.

An amusing personal anecdote I’d like to relate now involved a Jesuit priest, Fergal McGrath. This kindly man used to come once a year to my parents’ house ever since I can remember. He would arrive around six o’clock in the evening and I would always be warned to be on my best behaviour as Father McGrath was coming for tea. So we sat around the table while the priest intoned the grace before meals and we would always bless ourselves with great solemnity and sanctity. Tea was a light hearted affair where we all chatted amicably. I always remember this as he never ever asked me whether I said my prayers at night or some other stupid priestly question. After tea another bout of holiness descended briefly as the grace after meals was said whereupon the good priest along with my mother and father removed themselves into the sitting room. Myself and my brother were banned from this room for that one evening in the year. God knows what they talked about, but we often heard the strains of an oboe being played, so it wasn’t all talk.

However, as I grew older I was no longer banned from the sitting room, other than by myself as I certainly didn’t want to spend evenings in theological discussion or listening to an oboe. However, shortly after my discovery of Teilhard de Chardin, I sat in the good man’s presence and asked him about the Jesuit who had upset the Church. I genuinely wanted to know what he might have thought about him, but Fergal McGrath was a very conservative, non-confrontational man who only smiled knowingly and refused to be drawn.

Damn! My first serious attempt at dialogue with the Catholic Church failed miserably.